Author
: Arwa Alturki
Affiliation
: Department of Computer Science, King
Saud University
Country
: Saudi Arabia
Category
: Computer Science & Information
Technology
Volume,
Issue, Month, Year : 7, 5, April, 2017
Abstract
Spectroscopy
or hyperspectral imaging consists in the acquisition, analysis, and extraction
of the spectral information measured on a specific region or object using an
airborne or satellite device. Hyperspectral imaging has become an active field
of research recently. One way of analysing such data is through clustering.
However, due to the high dimensionality of the data and the small distance
between the different material signatures, clustering such a data is a
challenging task.In this paper, we empirically compared five clustering
techniques in different hyperspectral data sets. The considered clustering
techniques are K-means, K-medoids, fuzzy Cmeans, hierarchical, and
density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise. Four data sets are
used to achieve this purpose which is Botswana, Kennedy space centre, Pavia,
and Pavia University. Beside the accuracy, we adopted four more similarity
measures: Rand statistics, Jaccard coefficient, Fowlkes-Mallows index, and
Hubert index. According to accuracy, we found that fuzzy C-means clustering is
doing better on Botswana and Pavia data sets, K-means and K-medoids are giving
better results on Kennedy space centre data set, and for Pavia University the
hierarchical clustering is better.
Keyword
: Image Processing, Hyperspectral
Imaging, Imaging Spectroscopy, Clustering, FCM, K-means, K-medoids,
hierarchical, DBSCAN
For More Details : https://airccj.org/CSCP/vol7/csit76708.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment